Transcript
Dreama Hembree (00:00) hi, Dreama. Hi… they’re here. Are you ready? This is your show? Yeah, it’s not going to take the whole hour. I went through them all. So unless she’s got like a ton of rosters, then it’s pretty straightforward. But yep, go ahead. All right. Bye, Sandhya. Bye.
Dreama Hembree (00:29) Hi, Nashaun. Hi, good afternoon. How are you all doing? Doing well? How are you? Good? Hi, Hilary looks like she’s having trouble connecting to audio maybe. Oh, give her. There she goes. Hello.
Dreama Hembree (00:55) Do we have anybody else joining today? Hilary and Nashaun? Not from us. Okay? The purpose of today’s call.
Dreama Hembree (01:01) I think we went over it before is to go through the payer scoping spreadsheet and just review your enrollment… processes with ours to make sure we’re aligned to make sure there’s nothing special that you guys, do, you know, in terms of in the enrollment process that’s different than what we do in our standard enrollment process. And then just make sure we’re aligned on that level. So with that, I will go ahead and share my screen. Let me know when you can see that. Yes. Okay. So this spreadsheet is a little bit different than the one that we’ve kind of revamped Hillary. So the only thing that I need to call out, I went through each enrollment line and kind of compared them to what you put here. You didn’t call out anything in terms of non standard enrollment processes. So I just want to make sure that there’s and I know you don’t know what we do in terms of what standard, but I guess my question for you is for any of the payers? Are you submitting them like directly to a provider rep, a contact directly at the plan? Are you using any special roster to leverage those enrollments? And we can go line by line if that’s easier for you or if you know, in particular, a plan that you want to start with, we could do that too.
Dreama Hembree (02:37) Gosh. Okay. The.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (02:40) Big mcos is just we’re subject to whatever everybody else.
Dreama Hembree (02:48) Does just the standard enrollment? Okay, correct? Correct? So, I went through each of them and just looked at our directory and kind of, you know, just reviewed the standard enrollment process. So if you’re pretty confident and that’s what you’re using, are you using any rosters for any of the payers?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (03:09) Well, anything with Illinois is the universal, right? I mean, that’s like all the mcos for Illinois utilize hfs impacts universal roster is my understanding.
Dreama Hembree (03:24) Okay. So, Aetna blue cross, just the Illinois payers, you’re saying medicaid correct? Okay. When you have a chance, you don’t have to do it during the call, would you be able to go in and just link that? If it’s the same for all payers, could you just link it to one right here in this column? H? So I can review it and make sure your roster is what medallion is using. And then we will make sure that is aligned. And then the second step is to get that mapped on the back end. So that’s the second process there if it’s not mapped. Okay? So, I guess, sorry?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (04:09) Not knowing what your standard protocols are, right? Like what about the medi, cal, managed care plans, current health systems, that kind of thing?
Dreama Hembree (04:20) So, do you know the standard, what process you guys are using today to enroll?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (04:29) I haven’t had to because it’s a new contract. I’d… have to go back and check.
Dreama Hembree (04:40) So for kern, we can look at the, I need the directory yep, hang on here. This is our payer directory. So, kern health systems, we’ll look at this. So for a new enrollment for a provider in the state of California, our application method would be, the standard process is to follow the, you know, that we have the link here for the payer website. Okay? So it’s just the standard way we would enroll. And so obviously providers must be enrolled with traditional medicaid first. So there would be that dependency on the line. And then once that was enrolled and met, then we would move on to the managed medicaid plans?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (05:23) Okay. So, can I sort of ask and reverse this? Is there a way that you can tell me, I guess where you don’t have a standard application method, well?
Dreama Hembree (05:38) We have a standard application method for all of the payers. So I went through your entire I’m sorry. So I have Lasalle highlighted here because it is an ipa and that’s one of the ones I wanted to call out to discuss to make sure we were aligned because on the payor website or on the enrollment directory, hang on. We’ll pull that one up and look at it.
Dreama Hembree (06:05) So, for new enrollment for provider over California, I had this one up, hang on. Let me pull this over here so you can see it because I already looked at it here’s. Lasalle. So there’s their ipa home. So it’s basically just joining the network, you know, the contact us and then it’s the.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (06:30) They have their own portal, and honestly, I’m getting training on it on Thursday… for enrollment. Yeah, in general, just,
Dreama Hembree (06:42) in general, yeah.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (06:44) And so I mean, that’s obviously something if we can add a note on there and just say I’ll know more, but I’m assuming it’s through their portal, okay?
Dreama Hembree (06:57) I’ll mark that one as you’re reviewing it. And if there is a roster for that one that they want you to utilize for enrollment again, if you could link it here. Okay? Because in our directory, we don’t show a roster used for that. So that’s the point of that. If you’re using a roster for your enrollment, if you would link them here. So I can just make sure that, you know, a, we have the same information. Your group hasn’t been given a special enrollment process outside of our standard process. And so if that is the case, then I would create kind of a custom operating process for that particular payer for you for the team to follow. Does that make sense? Right?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (07:38) Yeah, it’s actually tomorrow at noon. So like in less than 24 hours, I’ll be able to tell you what that answer is. And I’m assuming that any of the ipas are going to be in the same kind of category, right? Because they’re going to be tend to have more.
Dreama Hembree (07:53) Correct. So, if you’re sending this, yeah, to like, you know, a specific person at Lasalle or anything like that, that’s what we would want to call out on here.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (08:01) Okay. And then what about all the ones where the ads are done via availity? Because you guys don’t access availity on our behalf, correct? We?
Dreama Hembree (08:11) Do access availity on your behalf? Oh, okay. So that will be one of the tasks that are tasked out to you for you to give us availity access? Yep. I may, I think I’ve or was that not correct? No, I mean, or… do we already have it?
Naomi Denson (08:30) I thought I had sent instructions over, but if not, let me.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (08:35) Let me verify, I don’t recall giving you guys access yet.
Naomi Denson (08:39) All right. Let me, I’ll send those instructions over now, okay?
Dreama Hembree (08:45) So we can be proactive yep. Oh, well, you can get working on that, and then, yes. So to your question, Hillary, we will access availity for those payers that require it. Perfect.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (08:56) Okay. Yep. Now, my understanding is, so I’m still trying to learn availity, is that like when we do, right? Because you have the every 90 days attestation thing that they’ve implemented and a lot of times I can do it and I’ll go just so you know, this is going to apply to, this and this, right? Like blue shield, Aetna, better health, whatever?
Dreama Hembree (09:23) So I.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (09:24) guess, is there any unique processes in the, in those situations? Because like for instance, when I updated our hours of operation and I did that on availity, next thing, you know, I got 28 emails because it applied to every provider for.
Dreama Hembree (09:41) that.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (09:42) right. Did.
Dreama Hembree (09:43) I get that, right? Nashaun, just letting you know that it’s been, it was updated, yes, yeah.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (09:48) It was like, right? And then it goes through statuses. It’s like this is either a case and it’s open. And then it’s a case that’s complete or it’s like no action required. So, does that mean I’ll still get those, but you guys are acting on them or I guess, help me understand? I guess maybe availity a little bit more and how you guys interact with them?
Dreama Hembree (10:10) Naomi, I’m not sure on that. Do you know, do we do the attestations directly in availity? Or is that still with the client responsibility? My?
Naomi Denson (10:18) Understanding we don’t manage the roster like maintaining the rosters in availity. We only handle the submission of direct enrollment?
Dreama Hembree (10:28) Applications? Okay.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (10:32) Nashaun, can you make note of that? So that’s something that we’re tracking as primary. Okay. Thank you. Okay. So going back to our scoping, so I see you’ve got vaccn highlighted also. Is there a particular question there?
Dreama Hembree (10:55) Well, triwest was listed twice. So the vaccn network falls up under triwest. So I just wanted to make sure there wasn’t something specific that I was missing there or something. Oh.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (11:09) Okay. And now, and I’m sorry, I come from a tricare background, so I probably took it too far into the weeds on that one. No, you’re okay.
Dreama Hembree (11:16) And then with the restructuring of the west and with triwest being the vendor, it gets a little it.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (11:22) Gets a little tricky, right? And that’s more so, right? And that’s literally me going in the weeds. It’s because I was with the previous contractor. So, I know that contract came in later then because the va was already set up right under triwest. Then triwest got it on January first 20 25. So I believe our contracts have two separate start dates.
Dreama Hembree (11:43) So that makes sense. So.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (11:46) That’s why I listed it twice and I put it as the actual organization even though the government product is separate, right?
Dreama Hembree (11:54) It’s just a different product but still under triwest. So I just wanted to make sure that there wasn’t something specific.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (11:59) That’s why I did it that way. Yes. And the only reason I put priority to support different high versus medium is because we get more business out of tricare. That was my rationale on that one. Okay? We don’t get as many referrals from the va, but that’s an internal them issue. It’s just that we’re building our business with tricare. So they’re a higher priority to me. Okay?
Dreama Hembree (12:28) All right. Perfect. All right. I just want to make sure that we didn’t need to separate something out or if there was something, you know, specific that was happening there. Okay.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (12:36) So, for the most part, look, did I have? Okay, I don’t have Cova on here. So what I did is I removed there’s two of them. There’s like key medical group and there’s Cova, that are ipas also, okay. Key medical group. I have a it’s actually not even a contract. It’s a letter of agreement. And so being that it was a letter of agreement, I actually just omitted it from this payer list because… it’s non. It’s it’s non traditional everything.
Dreama Hembree (13:14) Okay. So, are we enrolling the providers in that network?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (13:18) No, it’s more of like a, just a group. It’s a group kind of status it’s not individual provider action.
Dreama Hembree (13:26) Okay. So they don’t need to be notified of a new provider joining your group or you’re going to?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (13:30) No, no. And, and I guess that sort of summarizes it is, I chose to remove it because it has a very unique process… that is more at a group level overarching and they don’t do any individual credentialing. Okay? So I just chose, are you?
Naomi Denson (13:51) Going to continue to own that process internally and not medallion for the group updates that?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (13:56) Is correct. That’s why I kept Cova and key medical off is because there’s nothing for you to, there’s nothing for you to act on that. Do we?
Dreama Hembree (14:07) Need to have that listed? I guess it’s a client preference Naomi in the platform as client owned lines or is that kind of up to Hillary if she wants to track it in there?
Naomi Denson (14:17) That’s up to her.
Dreama Hembree (14:18) Okay. Yeah. We can list it in there, Hillary as client owned if you want to utilize the platform for tracking purposes. But if there isn’t a really an enrollment per SE and nothing to track, then I don’t know that’s kind of a I.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (14:35) Guess, is there a way to load it then if I was to put Cova there or I was to put key medical group without having to provide all the other data field elements required. Is there a way to put it there? And then somehow just call out that this is a client managed program and do nothing more except keep it that way or do we have to put stuff there?
Dreama Hembree (15:01) Like from.
Naomi Denson (15:03) an existing enrollment standpoint, or?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (15:05) From, well, you said if we were to run a report, right of payers and all this stuff, is there a way that we could still put Cova and key medical group on here? But I’m managing it, they’re not doing individual credentialing, but I do have a letter of agreement and it would be nice if they were in the list of payers, it would just say client owned and that’s it, you guys don’t need to know anything else. It’s.
Naomi Denson (15:39) not going to say client owned necessarily, but medallion’s not going to do anything with it unless you asked us to. So you would just have to know internally that your teams should not be requesting those enrollments from medallion, but you wanted it loaded as like an existing enrollment for reporting?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (15:58) Yes. Do I have to put like, but do I have to put all this other stuff in order to accomplish that?
Naomi Denson (16:09) Like the like the lines of business and effective dates and things like that. Exactly. So for the import, yes, you can, but you can manually add them like at a group level, if you just wanted to add the group, existing enrollment into platform, there are ways to bypass like the effective date, and things like that… for key.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (16:31) It.
Naomi Denson (16:32) just depends on if the payer is available in platform, I see covid is, but I don’t see a key.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (16:39) Yeah, key medical group. And that’s why I purposely removed them. So what I did is I did scrub this some more. So if I’m in process with the contract right now and it’s not an executed agreement, I’ve omitted them from here until they ask me to do some type of credentialing action, I will keep them off. And then when they ask for a roster or they ask for that, that’s when I, and tell me if I’m wrong, that’s when I would add them saying I now want medallion to submit a roster of providers for this payor. And this program, is that the way to do it?
Naomi Denson (17:30) Like,
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (17:31) I’m so right now, I have six contracts in process, meaning that they’ve accepted my letter of interest. I’m redlining contracts right now. And the only thing the only thing they’ve asked for of me is a group level credentialing information, you know, like our adces certificate. So they have not asked for individual credentialing information yet. So I have omitted them or, you know, chose to keep them off the payor process scoping in full.
Naomi Denson (18:11) And we’re still just talking about key and Cova… or other payors too that you have open contracting requests for open?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (18:20) I have like six or seven right now going on.
Naomi Denson (18:23) For other payors, correct? Yeah.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (18:25) And other payors that are more of the mco level not an ipa.
Naomi Denson (18:31) Yes. So if we are eventually going to be submitting individual provider requests for those, they should be on this payor scoping sheet, which payors are they like just a taste?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (18:47) Molina healthcare of Illinois, blue cross, blue shield, Illinois, Aetna. Better health is on there already because we actually executed that agreement.
Naomi Denson (19:00) Yeah. So.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (19:03) But yeah. And I’ll be honest, I almost need it to be that way because otherwise, this gets too confusing for me. I mean, I’m a contracting director, I’m not a credentialing person. So I’m thinking more of the contract and we haven’t even been requested to do anything credentialing. So if that’s something I bring to the for.
Naomi Denson (19:29) Those payers, at least you will eventually have to enroll your providers.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (19:33) That’s the intent. But right now, I’m in a red line. So if they don’t agree to my terms, then I’m going to shut that down. So it’s not business for medallion to be concerned about right now is what I’m trying to say. Okay, I don’t know, I mean, I guess tell me why I need to do it your way because rationally, I’m thinking of it in a different mindset.
Naomi Denson (20:01) Well, as far as the scoping goes, you don’t need to do it our way via this because you don’t have processes set up with them.
Naomi Denson (20:08) Yet, the purpose of this is to review processes and things for your active payers. But if you do have something come up in the future where there’s a nuance or something, you could again revisit that with Dreama as new payers come up. If we’re not going to be following just the standard processes, but we still would need you to load the existing group enrollments. If you do agree to those contracts to the platform at some point when they’re approved. And I.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (20:37) guess that’s what I’m saying is right now to me, it’s not new business to introduce to medallion. So that’s why I chose to leave it off. Okay. Scoping wise, anything wise. Just right now, this is our current business. Everything that I have on the scoping sheet, everything that I have in our group enrollment, everything that we’re providing on the provider enrollment screens. I’m not, I don’t want to deal in gray areas right now because one, I don’t know what their enrollment process is. I haven’t been given a link to do a roster or submit a roster or anything like that. So I have no direction because I don’t know the rules of their engagement, right?
Naomi Denson (21:20) Okay. And if it does come later on, then we can revisit new payers as they come up, correct?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (21:26) I will treat it as a new payer saying medallion, this is a new payer. I’m you know, we need to add xyz and we are assigning medallion the credentialing process. Is that, do I have that right now? Yeah?
Naomi Denson (21:41) You would just communicate that to Dreama when new payers come into play?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (21:46) Okay, perfect. So there’s really nothing to call out then other than that. Okay, now, there’s one I have where I said group enrollment, current group enrollment. I’ve got one that said, no, which one was that Dreama… column? F, I just saw a red… see it up nope.
Dreama Hembree (22:11) Yeah, right there.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (22:13) Okay. So this is one. Okay. So I did add it. There is because I don’t know it’s going to be high. This is a pending contract we have, I did submit a roster already.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (22:33) But I don’t have an executed contract. They asked for the roster at the same time, like, you know, different payers have different things, right? Give us your roster first. Then we’ll give you the contract or here’s the contract. Then let’s do the roster. Sometimes it’s simultaneous. I didn’t know necessarily how to answer yes or no on group enrollment. So I listed it there in the scoping, but I put no for group enrollment because I don’t believe it’s on our group enrollment template. Okay.
Dreama Hembree (23:02) So, Naomi, should we remove that one until it’s an executed contract? Or what should we do with that one?
Naomi Denson (23:10) I mean, we don’t have to remove it because we’re not going to act on anything unless she requests it. And if the plan is for her to discuss that with you before then we don’t have to remove it.
Dreama Hembree (23:21) Okay. We can just leave it in there Hilary like Naomi said, the credentialing the enrollment requests come directly from you. So you’re going to go into the platform and you’re going to say enroll.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (23:32) These.
Dreama Hembree (23:33) providers in blue cross Illinois, this, you know, location et cetera. So we’re not going to just automatically act on anything until you give us that direction, so.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (23:44) And I’m not transferring it yet because it’s… just in the very initial status. So instead of transferring the credentialing to you guys right now, I’m waiting to hear what they’re going to say past this like, you know, like I literally just sent it and they have it. Now, this actually brings up something and I apologize, it’s outside of this conversation, but it’s something very big that Nashaun and I are currently working on. So with hfs impact… we submitted a number of registered dietitian applications in February. They are now all coming back to us saying that you did this wrong. You need to enroll them under… an atypical provider type. So it was like they said do this. So we did, so you’ve got an initial application number. And then when they rejected it, we did a new application as an atypical. And also, we had a previous approved provider that they now turned around and put them back in a region like they rescinded the approval saying you have to now redo it as atypical. Nashaun. I’m going to pass it off to you to explain. I don’t agree with them because atypical is not us. So Nashaun, can you explain that what we did discuss with Don this morning, please, right?
Nashaun Lee (25:24) And as we went through the hfs glossary and we began to look at the different terminology that they had listed for atypical providers, those providers were listed as providers that did not have or require npi numbers. And so they were listed for different types of organizations, maybe a taxi, or a bus driver, none that were any patient facing roles. And so, while we submitted the applications initially as rendering an individual, and we were attaching those providers to our group npi once they came back and said, now do the applications that’s atypical? Once we collaborated with our internal teams and saw that our providers aren’t atypical, they obviously do have npis, and that’s where we kind of put a halt to the process so that we can fully understand from hfs. How are they classifying dieticians? Because what we were seeing is that when I did the application for those providers in an atypical category, they were then placed under a social services category. And that’s where the taxonomy code was listed. And we believe that they were either labeling those providers or trying to label them similar to a community health worker. And that’s what we were learning today upon discovery.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (26:36) I just requested if I could share. Okay?
Dreama Hembree (26:38) So, what I did is with them, right? Right?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (26:43) So, I did a screenshot, so, right? So when we were going through the process, right? Of a new enrollment, we were selecting rendering servicing provider. And so you see the description, right? But then what they were doing is saying, no, it needs to be this atypical. And this atypical is throwing out saying, was this the one… who is not required to obtain an npi? So we’re… going back to we’re, actually, I’m drawing up an email today, going wait a second. I think you guys are misclassifying our RDS because we are not a cbo, we are not chws, we are actually licensed required licensed providers in the state of Illinois. So, therefore, they do have npi’s and we are a group practice, not… an fao. Okay? Does that make sense? Yeah.
Dreama Hembree (27:43) So, whatever the outcome is of this process with Illinois medicaid… communicate that back to me because if they do end up requiring you to register your providers as atypical, even though it says, right there, this is for a provider that doesn’t have an npi, that would be something that I would want to call out to the enrollment team that says, you know, we need to select this provider type et cetera.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (28:11) And that’s why I’m calling it out because literally, this happened between Friday and today. Okay? So.
Dreama Hembree (28:18) I’ll mark that one down as kind of in process in terms of, you know, what we need to, what we do or do not need to call out to the team. So we’ll follow up on that one. Okay?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (28:29) Yep. Just want to let you know because I mean, like we’re in the midst of getting like 15,000 referrals from a plan. And we’re waiting for hfs impact to approve our providers. And then they threw this in the, you know, this monkey wrench in the program. And I don’t agree. Somebody had said that they had done something to their platform, their system within the last 60 to 90 days. And I’m thinking that in that they created a mapping issue with our provider type.
Dreama Hembree (28:58) Yeah, it could be, they revamped those websites constantly as, you know.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (29:03) But I’ll keep you posted. I just wanted to bring that to your attention. Anything having to do with Illinois is now contingent upon what’s going on with hfs impact. Okay? And so if.
Dreama Hembree (29:12) you have any other clients with.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (29:15) Illinois, you might want to go, hey, research this for any pushbacks. Okay?
Dreama Hembree (29:22) I appreciate you bringing that out. I know we’ll follow up on that one once you get that sorted with them on what the final direction is. Yep. Okay. So takeaways I have if you can link rosters that are being leveraged in the enrollment process just here in the column H, just so I can peek at those and make sure that they align with what we have. Because as you know, the payers do like to revamp their rosters quite frequently as well. So, we want to be making sure that we are using the latest and greatest, if you’ve got one that we don’t then we’ll get that aligned on the back end for the enrollments.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (30:01) Okay. We too are also trying to figure out these rosters, right?
Dreama Hembree (30:08) Never ending. I know, right?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (30:11) Yeah, Nashaun, I’m going to put you on lead on this, please for the rosters, the scoping please. Okay. Got it. Yeah, we’re even trying to just figure out because we were out of the credentialing, right? Communication cycle before Nashaun being new. Me, it was outsourced. We don’t know who they were using and they did not share that information with us during the closeout, okay?
Dreama Hembree (30:38) And then Nashaun, if, during that process of, you know, you’re looking at the rosters, if you see that there was, you know, the rosters being sent to someone specific at the plan or whatever, if you would just call that out here and call them Jay, you know, rosters being sent to, you know, John smith at Aetna or whatever the case may be here because that would be considered like a non standard enrollment process that we’d want.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (31:01) But a standard one could be credentialing at Aetna. Com, right?
Dreama Hembree (31:05) Just if there’s anything that was out of the norm, you know, that you are doing that’s. Not typical for enrollment. Yeah. Got it. All right. Any other questions for the scoping process or any other questions in general?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (31:24) Nope. I’ve gotten it down. I’ve got like five more payers I need to update. And then, I know I said I was going to do it last week and something else came up. So, as soon as can you tell me what this medallion product update is… just got notification?
Dreama Hembree (31:43) Specifically, I don’t Naomi, do you know?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (31:46) Platform updated, support email generate and.
Dreama Hembree (31:48) Manage API keys. Oh, we are changing our support email that necessarily wouldn’t apply to you right now, that’s going to go live on the fifteenth. And so, since you’re not directly in the platform yet, it’s just a change in our email address for support. Okay?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (32:03) And then there’s something about payor enrollment, new enrollment request fields for faster submissions.
Dreama Hembree (32:09) Naomi, do you know what that one is?
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (32:13) It?
Naomi Denson (32:13) Says.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (32:14) New required fields on provider profiles, desired effective date and show in payor directory.
Naomi Denson (32:19) So, when you’re making requests for payor enrollment, there’s additional questions that they’ll ask you through the request process if you want the provider to be reflected in the payor directory, and if there’s a specific desired effective date that you want us to request.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (32:33) Oh, okay. Is that where, when we talked about like start date, first available approval date versus a future date kind of thing? Okay? Got it. Okay. Great. Well, thank you. Well.
Dreama Hembree (32:49) Thank you. Let me know if there’s any questions that come up in that process. Nashaun, Hillary, if you have anything, and then we’ll circle back. I think we have a meeting scheduled later.
Hillary Perez-Godfrey (32:59) We’re at seven 30 tomorrow morning, nine 30. You guys yep. All right. Okay. All right. Well, thank you everyone.
Naomi Denson (33:09) Thanks everyone.
Dreama Hembree (33:10) Bye, bye bye.