Transcript
Peter Bosworth (00:00) okay. Hey, Naomi… how’s it going?
Naomi Denson (01:35) Can you hear me? Yeah, good. How are you?
Peter Bosworth (01:39) I’m good.
Kim (01:41) So, I.
Peter Bosworth (01:42) mean, this is like the implementation call. So I don’t want to like step on your toes too much, but it’s the things that are kind of open items in terms of like discrepancies in the contract. Are there’s the integration piece, which is kind of underway. And then there’s the number of rosters, and then there’s the ogm discrepancy,
Naomi Denson (02:06) and we just met with Kate and we do need to enable facilities for them.
Peter Bosworth (02:11) And that’s facility enrollment?
Naomi Denson (02:14) Yes, which they’re not contracted for.
Peter Bosworth (02:17) Okay. So what I think my plan and I know we’re at 12 31, my plan is to just kind of bring those things up and then schedule another call with them to discuss those things.
Naomi Denson (02:27) Yeah, and I’ve got it. Kind of we’re going to go through the setup and I’m going to explain to them adding the facilities and if you want to jump in at that point.
Peter Bosworth (02:34) Yeah, that actually sounds perfect. Let’s do that.
Naomi Denson (02:37) Okay. I’ve only got Kim and somebody else.
Kim (02:43) Hello? Hey, how’s it going? Hey, how are you? Good, good.
Naomi Denson (02:50) Afternoon. Hello? Let’s see. But just the two of you today.
Kim (03:00) Yeah. Probably we are in Nashville for going through an RCM workshop. So.
Naomi Denson (03:06) Okay. They are, I’m not. Yeah, lucky you. Okay. All right. Let’s jump in. I wanted to check in the provider custom invite. You guys were going to have an internal call?
Kim (03:22) Yeah, we’re doing it next week. I think I want to make sure I understand how we’re going to like what all we’re asking like what all providers are going to have to do once they get in and all that kind of stuff so that we can talk about timing of when these go out.
Naomi Denson (03:43) Yeah. And.
Kim (03:45) we’ve got, you know, I think a town hall coming up. So like when, you know, when do we start letting them know? Hey, this is coming and this is what it’s going to mean for you and all of that. So we’ve got a call I think next Monday to finalize all those pieces for you guys.
Naomi Denson (04:04) Yeah. And on your attendance, I’m Manya york, not Manya hunter. So sorry, I’ve never met a Manya in my life. And now I have two of them that are on the same calls. Yeah, we get that quite often. Your name just says your zoom name just says staff. So I took my best stab. Yeah, my New York, I remember your face. Yeah. Okay, perfect. So you guys are on an internal call next week to align on the provider communications. I got the admin users. I will get you guys added. And then when we load the providers, we have the integration with caqh to do the bulk imports. I didn’t know with the size of your organization, do you have an organizational caqh account set up? Yes. So we can set up, you, can they’re… called pdqs credentials. I have a form and instructions on how to set that up and we can basically set it up to roster the providers to your account instead of medallion’s caqh account, which significantly can decrease the pass through fees of that okay of the bulk imports.
Naomi Denson (05:16) So, is that something that you guys would be interested in caqh recently this year? Increased their fees for that? So, it’s like, I think like eight something dollars per provider to do the imports unless you have your own organizational account that we can roster through. And then it’s I think like two dollars is, I think, Peter, do you know, I remember they announced those changes? Yeah.
Peter Bosworth (05:40) Yeah. I know the medallion, if you do it through medallion, it’s seven 35 and that is a one year like rostering fee. So if you rostered them on April eighth, you could do unlimited syncs between now and April eighth, 20 27. And then you’d be charged the seven 35 again. But I’m not super sure about the caqh cost.
Naomi Denson (06:01) I know it’s like five or six dollars less is what I’m thinking I can send you the instructions to set up the pdqs credentials. Yeah.
Kim (06:13) And then I guess just let us know what that looks like because we didn’t it’s not broken out for us. That way. We just have paid you guys like a lump sum amount. So.
Naomi Denson (06:21) Those fees for the caqh imports are additional fees outside of your contracted value.
Peter Bosworth (06:30) Yeah. They’re past their fees.
Kim (06:31) Yeah. Okay. So if there is anything outside of our contract, then we need to have a whole other conversation with sales because I was really clear about, I want every single thing that we could possibly be charged for and was told that I had, that we were given that and that I don’t believe was in there. So like that’s… a totally different conversation. I’m happy to talk to josh about if we need to, but that is yeah… like we are not going to be nickel and dimed. So like that was a super clear conversation. So if there’s anything additional besides what we had already had listed out on there, then I definitely like at this point, there, there will be no additional fees because like we were incredibly clear about that, so.
Naomi Denson (07:27) Okay. Yeah. So, the caqh imports. So without that… without us running that, yeah. Okay. Let me go back to josh.
Kim (07:36) You guys can take it out of implementation fees or take it out of other areas of the contract. But like we were incredibly clear about that. So if there’s additional fees of any kind, they’re not included in what we’ve already been told or in email, there’s got to be recordings on this multiple times. I know that it’s in writing like that’s. That’s something we very much should have already known about.
Staff (08:04) Absolutely, because in one of the conversations, we also talked about the national provider database and the fact that normally there’s pass through fees on that. And I know that was in conversation also, yeah.
Naomi Denson (08:15) The npdb verifications is the one time per provider. I can’t remember exactly the.
Peter Bosworth (08:21) 252.
Naomi Denson (08:22) 50 per year per provider for the npdb pass through fees for the monitoring.
Staff (08:28) Yeah. And that was in conversations too. So because Kim was very clear on everything had to be up front, okay?
Naomi Denson (08:36) Let us check with josh as… well… there. Yeah. So we’ll take that back. We also.
Kim (08:45) Have 236, 240 Ish providers right now, and I think the contract allows for 305. So, I mean, there’s I think there’s plenty there to cover whatever fees could come up. Yeah.
Peter Bosworth (09:02) I can speak to that so that I mean, and again, we will talk to josh and josh, but pass through fees, are entirely separate than the costs that are allocated in the medallion contract because they’re.
Kim (09:16) costs.
Peter Bosworth (09:17) That we incur and just pass on to you, but I.
Kim (09:22) fully respect that. I also just, I could not have been more clear in that conversation. So if we can figure that out, that would be great. Yeah.
Peter Bosworth (09:32) Absolutely.
Naomi Denson (09:35) Okay. We’ll take care of that. And then the data import template we talked last week about, the proper setup for… you guys. We met with our pay enrollment director of operations today and what we’re going to do is we’ve added a new tab here facilities. So you’ll have your group profiles with all of the individual practice locations. But for all of the rhc individual locations, we’ll also set up a facility profile because technically, from my understanding is the rhcs go through a facility contracting process separately like with medicare part a, and other payers where you’re contracting at facility level. So if we had group profiles and we were only running off of this, you couldn’t have any of the same payers, same state combos under the same group running in tandem. So, or request a new one for the rhc level on the group level, if there was already an existing enrollment for that payer, does that make sense? So.
Kim (10:45) The facility tab is going to be where all of the rhc, yes, numbers are in the, okay. And the practices is going to be any fee for service numbers, yes?
Naomi Denson (10:58) So the, yes. So the locations for the fee for service, and then the facility profiles will be for rhcs.
Naomi Denson (11:04) Now, if you’re doing both kinds of enrollment, we need a practice location for the rhc at the group level, and a facility profile for the rhc itself for the facility contracts. Does that make sense?
Kim (11:19) Yes. And they’re not. Yeah, they’re not like facility contracts, but yeah, I hear you group.
Staff (11:26) Contracts. And then there’s facility contracts. So, yeah.
Kim (11:31) Okay. So the practices, so we’ve got the group, the provider tab is complete. The group tab is complete. I’m waiting on like the fax numbers from skip which I should have in about five seconds. Okay? So then the group because, and it really doesn’t matter actually like the group profile, I think all I’m missing is like a billing fax number, I think for you. And that’s that happens at the practice and the facility level anyway… not at the tax id level. So you’re I think you’re I think the only thing we’re missing here is a, is the fax number, I… believe just double check this, yeah.
Naomi Denson (12:16) Billing fax, yeah.
Kim (12:17) Billing fax. So I can actually, I think we’re just going to use the fax number for hardy… Manya… since like all males goes to hardy anyway, like I’ll do the same thing at the tax id level, just use all like any faxes would go there. And then we’ll at the practice level and the facility level we’ll have like the one that’s tied to that actual location, so that I’ll have for you and like my computer’s in the other room, but I should have that just a second, no.
Naomi Denson (12:53) Problem. Yeah. So I’ll go ahead and highlight that green and then the practices, are you going to leave a practice location for all of the service locations here and then create the facilities for the additional pretty?
Kim (13:08) Much it’ll be pretty much the same thing. It should be a pretty similar like copy paste. I think. Okay, just the only thing that’ll change is there will be like medicare and medicaid numbers that’ll be different.
Naomi Denson (13:24) OK. And then just one comment here on the.
Staff (13:29) Facility tab, there will actually be two less facilities than there are practices because we’ve got two that aren’t rhc yet. OK?
Naomi Denson (13:40) And then just one thing that we do recommend unique values are recommended on the practice names. So I see you have the same names here a few times. If there’s any like kind of like practice code or something that you could add after this to make them unique for when you’re requesting to just kind of reduce any errors or if they have, I.
Kim (14:04) Could use their like department code from athena. Yeah.
Naomi Denson (14:10) I’ve had customers do that before. It just makes it easier when you’re requesting to identify which location you’re adding if they have some sort of unique identifier there. So we do recommend that. And then on the facilities, if you would just add, well, I’m assuming that they’re all going to be rhcs, correct… all the facilities. So I don’t think, yes, we had talked about on our internal call adding rhc to the end of the name, but knowing that they’re all rhcs, I don’t think that’s necessary.
Kim (14:41) But do you want the same? I mean the same practice code there as well? Yes. Yeah.
Naomi Denson (14:47) If they’re going to be this like we don’t you don’t want to see the same name in our system like 14 different times and then get confused and accidentally request the wrong location or something like that. So, yes, let’s duplicate, do.
Kim (15:00) We want, go ahead, Monia?
Staff (15:03) Would it be better to use like dash and whatever city they’re in instead of the athena code?
Naomi Denson (15:11) I have customers that do that too. Okay?
Staff (15:14) Because unless you’re working in athena, you’re not going to know and you could very easily have the same code because there are different table spaces.
Naomi Denson (15:24) Yeah. Except for this one that’s got big spring twice, you might, that might be confusing. So big spring, a big spring B, I don’t know. Yeah.
Jason Zednick (15:33) I have another client that has a lot of these sort of duplicate names and we use the street address and you can combine like address line one and address line two, if they’re suites. And then that’s that just makes it really clear because then you have it all in one. We.
Staff (15:51) Refer like the big springs when we’re talking about internally, we talk about big spring uc or big spring peds?
Naomi Denson (15:58) Okay. Yeah. So you could put, yeah, you could do peds?
Staff (16:01) That’s like on the camden, it’s actually… Kim, you’ve got too many camdens and we don’t have a clinic at Searcy, anymore. Okay? So, because you’ve got closed clinics listed in there too.
Kim (16:18) Yeah. I mean, I’ve pulled from like what… seemed like the most up to date one. So I think, yeah, I’ll definitely, you know, on these… Moni, what’s your, like what’s your day, what is today? And tomorrow? Like can, are you in a spot where you could do like mine?
Staff (16:39) Are actually, yeah, mine are actually pretty good right now considering that you guys are gone. I.
Kim (16:44) Know, we’re gone. So we’re leaving you alone. Could you, could you do those two tabs the practices and the facilities tabs, yes, to make sure those are like up to date. And then I think we’re we’ll be in good shape. And then provider practice groups like what… this?
Naomi Denson (17:03) Is saying that provider John smith works at this practice location under this group. So this creates associations and medallions to show which practices the providers are affiliated with and which groups tie into those, or which practices tie into the group profiles?
Staff (17:18) Okay. We have providers who go across all groups.
Naomi Denson (17:23) That’s fine. Yeah, they can be associated. It’d be one group per provider practice group combination.
Staff (17:32) Okay. My next question was, is there a tab on here? Yeah. Okay. I see provider primary practice primary. Is that for the location? Yeah. Okay. That’s fine. I see the tab. I answered my question.
Naomi Denson (17:46) Okay. Yes. There. And then with the facilities tab, we also added a facility enrollments tab. So this is for the existing facility contract information. So it’s broken out providers groups and facilities now. So we added the additional tab to separate the rhc contracts as well.
Kim (18:09) Okay. And that we should be able to pull from athena Manya. So we shouldn’t have to go one by one on all of that is the hope. But if you’ve got, if you’ve got the bandwidth to do those three tabs, then I think we are done. I can start, I could start working on it in the evening, but I’m going to be delayed today and tomorrow. So if you’ve got bandwidth then we can get that knocked out. Yeah.
Staff (18:45) I can get the practice and the facility tabs done. Okay?
Naomi Denson (18:49) All right. And then once we have all of these and all of the other tabs can follow the existing external accounts. If you guys have started, this is still missing a couple of emails here. Yep for those, I was looking through this earlier and saw that a couple were missing. So are we just skipping these providers? We’re pretty close.
Kim (19:12) No, we, no, we’re not skipping them. We’re just, I gotta, I’ve gotta go back and grab it’s all in different places. So I just have to go back and.
Naomi Denson (19:21) grab. All right. Just let me know when everything I know these are mostly ready. Just let me know when everything’s ready on here. So we can do one import and not piecemeal it together. And then the external accounts will fall in with that. The recredentials, this is for existing credentialing that you already have on your providers to schedule them for recredentialing in the future. So if you already have provider John smith with his initial credentialing date, latest credentialing date, recredentialing deadline that you want us to only do recredentialing on when he’s due and not a full initial credentialing on all of your providers. Those can be loaded here. The only way to add initial credentialing dates and recredentialing dates to create that record is by an import. So this can’t be manually entered later… unless it’s imported. So it’s not something you can just type in and change in the provider’s profile because it feeds those delegated rosters.
Kim (20:21) Okay. Most of that happened last may, right? Anya. Yes.
Staff (20:27) For the majority of.
Kim (20:27) the providers, it.
Staff (20:31) Was last may? Okay, we have a list. I have a list of all of that. Okay?
Kim (20:38) Easy enough. And.
Naomi Denson (20:40) Then for the credentialing, the team reviewed the credentialing policies and procedures. They did have a question, policies and procedures mentioned deathmaster. Prior to approval. Is that something that you guys are doing or was Andros doing that for you? Was that a PSP that was in the credentialing file? I reviewed all of the folders that you sent over. I couldn’t locate an individual provider credentialing file from Andros, josh had shared a facility one with me but I didn’t see any for individual providers to look at and cross check with the policies.
Staff (21:12) Okay. I can get you an individual one. Okay? And.
Naomi Denson (21:16) the deathmaster. Is that something you’re anticipating us doing? Or is that something you guys do internally?
Staff (21:24) They’ll have to come from you. We’re not able to get that listing. So it has to be done by a CSV?
Naomi Denson (21:39) Okay. All right. That was what I had, but are the deathmasters, are those included in the credentialing file for your providers? Yes. Okay. I didn’t know if it was just ongoing monitoring reports that you guys are verifying?
Naomi Denson (22:03) I mean, we didn’t see, any other streamlined verifications called out but are like CMS preclusions or ofac requirements in your credentialing packets as psvs?
Staff (22:20) Yeah, we did. Yeah, the psvs, you know, it’s all their licensure, all… the state exclusions, the federal exclusions, the deathmaster, the medicare opt out.
Staff (22:41) Of course, the national provider data bank.
Naomi Denson (22:50) Oig, Sam?
Staff (22:53) Oig, Sam Dea.
Naomi Denson (22:56) So, is the Dea for only specific providers or are all providers required to have one? Like is it only for specific provider types?
Staff (23:07) No. All of the providers. Okay? And sometimes when we first hire on the people, they’re a new grad, they don’t have it yet or they’re transferring from another state and then their collaborative covers for them until that Dea is acquired.
Naomi Denson (23:24) And then for the collaborative agreements, there were specific provider types listed in your policies and procedures that require those. One question that our team has was, do those expire. I’ve seen a couple of instances. Let me find her question specifically. They’re.
Staff (23:42) supposed to be reviewed annually… peace.
Naomi Denson (23:51) And are you Naomi?
Kim (23:53) Is there a spot in medallion where the collaborative is?
Naomi Denson (23:56) Yes, there is. Let’s see.
Naomi Denson (24:07) We just need to clarify, yes, we just need to clarify that the provider types that need the collaborative agreements are only pa and P, a PRN… and if and when they expire, how… if and when they expire. So you said reviewed annually… do they need to have a new signature on them? Like with dated within the last calendar year? Like are they issuing new ones each year?
Staff (24:41) No, they just reviewed the ones in initial off on them, that’s what they were supposed to be doing. Okay?
Naomi Denson (24:47) And then if that’s not in our policy?
Staff (24:51) Yeah, that’s not on our side of the policy and procedure that’s like the nursing board asked for it to be done.
Naomi Denson (24:57) Okay. But you have it as part of your credentialing files?
Staff (25:04) If they send it back to us, we have their initial one, it.
Kim (25:10) Should be part of it though. So like, yes, if there’s a process that can initiate like a review and a signature, then yeah, we want to account for that. Yeah.
Staff (25:17) We want to account for it. We want to get it there.
Naomi Denson (25:21) And then last question was if they did not provide one, and there’s not one in their profile, how would you like us to outreach for that? Do you want us to task the providers directly through the system or task admins only, meaning you all to then reach out to the provider to obtain that or to share it?
Staff (25:43) It would be reaching out to us because the way our system works, we know when we hire on that ancillary… that mid level, we are the ones responsible for initiating that agreement, we fill it.
Naomi Denson (26:03) Out. We.
Staff (26:04) Send it to them to sign? We send it to the collaborative or supervising to sign, who then sends it back. They have to, and then we send it back to them and they send it to the state.
Naomi Denson (26:15) Okay. And then for all other, anything else that might be missing or need follow up from our team, do you want us to only task you all first for anything or is there anything that you guys would like us to task the provider to directly? Like if their education verification isn’t matching up with what we have in platform. Maybe they went under a different name that they didn’t provide and we need clarification, their Coi is expired and we do an attempt to obtain a new one?
Staff (26:45) Okay. The Coi is company provided. Okay? So reaching to them for Coi would be a waste of everyone’s time because we’re the ones who have the cois… education wise. We have always asked them to provide a copy of their degree or their final transcript. Okay? And that’s something we still need to continue because there are a few payers who asked for that. So.
Naomi Denson (27:14) Yeah. So we can set it up on our end to where our credentialing team is tasking to you all only for anything that we might need. Those were just some examples. Is that how you guys would like to proceed?
Kim (27:24) During implementation? Yes. As we’re gathering all that, and if those are settings, we can change once we go live, we can make some decisions about how we want like new newly onboarded providers to be tasked. But I would say during implementation, yeah, I think it’s at least for now just because we don’t know, we don’t know like let’s start with us, and then we can always expand that if we need to.
Staff (27:56) Okay. Because the odds are for the existing providers, we should have all of that.
Naomi Denson (28:00) Already. Okay, perfect. Yeah. And after implementation, if you guys do want to change to provider tasks or anything like that, Jason as your em can help handle and coordinate that with the team. But initially we can do admin tasks only. So you guys are handling anything that we might need or need clarification on, all right.
Naomi Denson (28:21) So, and then if you will just send me over any copies or legacy credentialing packets that you could share with us just to add to our files and reference for the psvs make sure we’re getting everything set up correctly… Peter, did you have anything?
Peter Bosworth (28:38) Yeah. Kim, I was wondering if we would be able to maybe grab some time together later this week or early next week to discuss just some of the different kind of discrepancies which would be just this roster… there’s 15 rosters that were sent over in terms of like actual templates whereas the contract includes four.
Peter Bosworth (29:04) And then the need for, you know, some of these like ongoing monitoring checks that we just discussed like death master, for example, and facility enrollment as well. So just to get on the same page, would it be possible for us to connect?
Kim (29:21) Yeah, we can do that for sure.
Peter Bosworth (29:23) Okay.
Kim (29:25) Yeah.
Naomi Denson (29:27) There.
Staff (29:27) Was four companies, but one company requires per state, one per, state.
Kim (29:32) Right?
Naomi Denson (29:34) Right.
Peter Bosworth (29:36) Would, maybe it sounds like you’re traveling this week?
Kim (29:41) Yeah, I’m just, I’m here with the billing team until tomorrow, but should… free up either late tomorrow afternoon and I’ve got some time on Friday. Okay?
Peter Bosworth (29:54) What about Friday at 10 30 a M Central Time?
Kim (30:03) That should work. Yeah.
Naomi Denson (30:07) That works. Okay, great.
Peter Bosworth (30:11) I’ll send over an invite and we’ll touch base then.
Kim (30:16) Okay. No, that sounds good. Anyone.
Peter Bosworth (30:19) Else I should include on that besides Kim waters at AMC medical clinic?
Kim (30:26) No, I mean, that’s contract review stuff. So I think we’ll be fine. I’ll if I have to harass mania on it, I can, but I’ll spare her that.
Naomi Denson (30:37) Okay. Sounds good. And.
Kim (30:39) Then I guess Naomi, we talked about like what… does we’ve? Got a board, you know, a board meeting, I think in the middle of July.
Kim (30:49) So the goal was to have all this stuff live, not just you guys, but like all software that we were dealing with, I think live by end of June at the latest. But ideally, we’ve we can get this live, and working in place, you know, early to mid June. Yeah, as long.
Naomi Denson (31:11) As we look.
Kim (31:12) At that timeline, we feel like that’s something we can realistically do, yeah.
Naomi Denson (31:18) As long? Yeah. So, the biggest delay usually is the data which you guys have already gotten a jump on. So, as long as we get that Adalee, when do you think would be a good deadline to get all data back to be imported and ready for go live by June? Like mid June,
Adalee Arreola (31:39) Mid June, I would say we want at least two.
Kim (31:43) Weeks ahead.
Adalee Arreola (31:46) Of time before then ideally three.
Naomi Denson (31:49) But.
Kim (31:50) I mean, we should have this to you by the end of the week, I think, yeah, then.
Adalee Arreola (31:54) I think that’s super reasonable. I.
Kim (31:56) don’t I don’t see any like issues at the moment?
Naomi Denson (31:59) Yeah. And then for the ncqa files… we have a standard ncqa file that follow the ncqa standards. If there’s any additional verifications or configurations required. It does require some assistance from our engineering team so that those tickets once we get all of that confirmed can take up to two weeks too, but I can do those in tandem with Adelie doing the data. We don’t have to wait for that to be done.
Kim (32:27) Yeah, so.
Naomi Denson (32:28) That can be part of it as well. But as long as we get facilities up and running that payer process scoping sheet, we’ll have a payer process scoping call with Jason to review all of your processes and policies and make sure that our team is aligned on how your work should be done.
Kim (32:45) Yes. So.
Naomi Denson (32:47) Once that scoping template is done and ready, we will do that. And then we’ll go through the scoping process call as well as a payer mapping exercise to make sure that the names that you have are mapped correctly to the names in medallion for our standard payer names. So given if all of that goes smoothly, you know, over the next couple of weeks, I say mid June is not a stretch. Okay? No.
Kim (33:14) It sounds great. I mean, ideally, you know, we can hit early June and have time to work out any kinks, and, you know, integrations can come later. I don’t think, you know, I think we had some shutdown on the athena side anyway this morning, not a huge surprise. But, and there’s you know, the rhc certification process is something that’s a little more custom that should not prevent us from like going live with all the things that are core and really matter. So if there’s some custom pieces to track in some of that, I think like, we can agree that doesn’t have to be like MVP or anything like that. So, but really excited about where this is headed. And thank you guys for, I know for making some figuring out how to solve for those extra rhc numbers and how to account for all that.
Naomi Denson (34:10) That’s what we’re here for is to make sure you are set up and ready to roll and make sure all of your work is done correctly. The, the first time?
Kim (34:18) No, this is great. I really appreciate it. I know it’s a lot and we, we’re throwing a little bit of some nuance, to the process as well. So, thanks for your flexibility.
Naomi Denson (34:28) Yes. And, I appreciate you guys coming, with the knowledge needed to know how to set this up. And you know, it helps the process move a lot smoother, when we have knowledgeable team members, on these calls to help drive everything. So, I appreciate.
Kim (34:44) You all well, that’s why Manya’s name is staff because it’s just whatever, what do you need to know? Because she’s just she’s got it. What help do?
Naomi Denson (34:50) You need to put on? Do you even know all Manya?
Staff (34:52) It’s only because I’ve been with the company since 2017, when we only had like nine clinics.
Naomi Denson (34:58) So, that’s okay. They call me queen. So.
Kim (35:02) Well, there you go. There you go. Well.
Naomi Denson (35:05) You guys have a good day. Yeah.
Kim (35:07) Let us know. Thanks so much, Manya. If you need any help with any of those, let me know. I can jump in this evening or tomorrow.
Staff (35:16) Okay. I’ve just got to find my link again, to the sheets, so.
Naomi Denson (35:21) I can send it to you. Okay? That would be quicker.
Naomi Denson (35:27) All right. Appreciate you guys. Thank you, Manya. I’m going to drop that in the chat for you right here. Before I close the meeting. Did she drop? Manya? Did you get the link? I put it in the chat here? I.
Staff (35:46) Was looking for it. It dropped me real quick. I don’t there it is. Got it. Awesome. All right. Okay. Thank you. I’ll have Nicole send you over what her current onboarding looks like?
Naomi Denson (36:04) Okay. All right. Perfect. Sounds good. Thank you so much. Thank you. All right. Bye bye.